English 4, Post 3, 'Themed Free Post - Carrer Related [hopefully]'
Warm Salutations,
Prospective Biochemists, Chemists and Food Engineers and Pharmaceutical Chemists from FCQF,
This week, I am bringing to you the third out of eight blog sessions.
In this particular session, you will be asked to do the following class assignment:
- Comments: Leave a comment on your teacher’s entry + 3 of your classmates' posts
- Word Count: 180 words
- You are free to write any topic [related to your study program] you want to, in any manner.
As usual, I will leave you a sample. This time an extract from a literature essay that I and a classmate wrote a few years ago,
"The Scarlet Letter as a biformous narrative: Characterization.
Hawthorne’s novel, ‘The Scarlet Letter’ can be said, inhabits ‘biformity’, a term which has been coined by Michael Kammen in his essay ‘Biformity: A Frame of Reference’. More particularly, the novel’s ‘biformity’ can be found in the construction of one of its main characters, Hester Prynne.
As a starting point, ‘Biformity’ can be shaped as an ambivalent state of two opposing philosophical and moral forces that, “Subject people to more extreme contrasts and abrupt changes during a lifetime or a generation than is normally the case with other great nations” (Kammen, 101) Moreover, ‘biformity’, is said to develop “a tension between newer and older human ways of acting and believing”. (Kammen, 99)
‘Biformity’ can also be explained through the creation of a national identity, a creation of a collided and contradictory identity, which furthers back in time to the creation of the Puritan collective. America`s first settlers are said to be contradictory as well, or, as a better term can encompass, America’s first settlers might possibly have lived in a ‘biformity’, or, as Kammen points out, to have lived in ‘extreme contrasts and abrupt changes during a lifetime’ (Kammen, 101).
Such are the contrasts that the national American character proposes, that ‘biformity’ falls into a further conceptualization concerned with its historical and philosophical implications, as Leo Marx points out: “The dialectical tendency of mind – the habit of seeing life as a collision of radical opposed forces and values – has been accentuated by certain special conditions of experience in America”. (Kammen, 107)
The character of the American people, according to Marx, is said to have a dialectical tendency to see the conformation of life as a radical collision of opposing forces. The reality for American people is dialectical, in constant contradiction, and within this apparent struggle of opposing forces, the national character of America emerges". (...)
References
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Scarlet Letter. Wordsworth Editions Limited. 1992.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Scarlet Letter: An authoritative text. Essays in Criticism and Scholarship, Third Edition. WW Norton and Company. 2005
Kammen, Michael. People of Paradox: An Inquiry Concerning the Origins of American Civilization. Knopf, New York. 1972.
Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and The Profane: The Nature of Religion. Harcourt, Inc. 1957.
waaaa I definitely am not good for a career with so much lyrics and philosophy, sorry
ReplyDeleteWhat a complex analysis, but interesting!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletewow, that Marx analysis was complex... but at the same time interesting
ReplyDeletehmm, the phrase "I hurt you because I love you" can be called some type of 'biformity'? Great post!
ReplyDeleteI find it impressive when people do these analyzes
ReplyDeleteI think biformous is a somewhat complex concept to understand for me, literature is not really my favorite area.
ReplyDeleteGreat literature essay, but it's a little bit complex to understand it for me. I'm sorry for that.
ReplyDeleteRegards!
Interesting, I've heard of The Scarlet Letter movie but I've never seen it.
ReplyDeletethis essay was really difficult for me to understand
ReplyDeleteThis is the first time I hear about the "biformity"
ReplyDeletewow, I had a hard time understanding it
ReplyDeleteIt sounds instresting but complex. I like it
ReplyDeleteI like this type of analyzes
ReplyDeleteI had never heard about the concept of biformity, it seems complex
ReplyDelete